Active Surveillance P L U S — Donna’s Vision

“Active surveillance” of a potential cancerous condition through periodic medical imaging in itself can be extremely stressful — and the anxiety, worry and fear of cancer developing or progressing may not go away as time goes on.   balance

Active Surveillance P L U S is my vision. It is a holistic approach to cancer prevention, risk reduction and optimal wellness — and this strategy should not be considered “alternative.”

P L U S stands for Proactive – Lifestyle – Understanding – Support

P R O A C T I V E

Action and result-oriented strategies which can help reduce cancer risk and keep us feeling empowered, supported, centered, optimistic, and healthy (body, mind & spirit). See “Proactive Breast Health Club.”  

L I F E S T Y L E

Holistic wellness is not a diet or exercise plan. It is a combination of influential factors — a way of living, thinking and being — supported by scientific evidence to be protective against cancer. See Anticancer Living: The Mix of Six 

U N D E R S T A N D I N G

Knowledge is power. Investigate until you have a deep understanding of both your individual medical condition and how the body heals through a combination of holistic mind-body-spirit strategies. Review Donna’s resources here; read articles and watch videos compiled by Donna and Sandie Walters here.

S U P P O R T

Support is a critical factor in optimal health outcomes. See ways to stay connected below.

Donna’s Vision…

Active Surveillance P L U S is…

Donna_give_wellness

  • recognized as standard “preventative care” which significantly reduces cancer-care costs, stress and unnecessary harm.
  • embraced and encouraged by all (including medical professionals).
  • not considered “alternative.”
  • covered by insurance.
  • inclusive of safe imaging modalities with women’s personal values and preferences taken into consideration.

Ways to Stay Connected & Supported:

Posted in Health, Options, Personal Stories, Sanity, Support | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Aggressive Treatments for DCIS — or NOT? New Research Sheds Light

photo-1440968872456-dec3196b9bee - Copy (2)Where are the studies of women (like me) who have taken a less aggressive path for “low-risk” DCIS? 

Until now — they didn’t exist.

Thanks to $13.4 million in funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), a long over-due clinical trial for DCIS has officially launched.

comet-logo

It’s called The COMET Study.

The goal is to learn if women with low-risk DCIS can avoid aggressive treatments and their physical and/or emotional side effects.

COMET stands for Comparison of Operative to Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy. It is a randomized prospective study that will enroll 1200 women at 100 cancer centers throughout the US.

My Role as a Patient Advocate

comet_3In 2016, I was invited to be one of four patient advocates on The COMET Study team.

We have enjoyed the opportunity to keep patient perspectives at the forefront of the study as well as this new website: www.dcisoptions.org

Since my DCIS diagnosis in 2010, I have been following and sharing the forward-thinking wisdom of a handful of breast cancer experts who were speaking out for the need for studies like COMET. It is such a blessing to now be working with some of these compassionate doctors who are leading the COMET Study…

In this video Dr. Shelley Hwang and I share patient and physician perspectives on DCIS.

 

donna-pinto_2016

Donna Pinto, DCIS 411

I hope every woman diagnosed with low-risk DCIS today knows they have a great opportunity that did not exist for me (and thousands others) in the past.

I feel an incredible sense of gratitude to all the forces and people that have made the COMET Study possible — to the physicians and cancer centers who are making it available — and to the women who will participate. Thank you!

 

A 2nd Project Takes DCIS Research Global 

funded-teams-hero-1_0I’m honored, thrilled, humbled and grateful to be a part of an international team of scientists and patient advocates from the UK, the Netherlands, and the US on a 2nd paradigm-shifting research project.

 

Preventing Unnecessary logoBreast Cancer Treatment  was recently awarded 15 million pounds by Cancer Research UK’s Grand Challenge.

The goal is to identify bio-markers that can distinguish DCIS patients with a low risk of developing cancer from patients with a high risk.

jelle-wesseling_150x150In this video, Jelle Wesseling, pathologist from the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses the need to be able to distinguish harmless DCIS from the potentially hazardous DCIS.

This research may help spare thousands of women unnecessary treatment.

More similar studies in Europe and the UK

  1. Management of Low-risk DCIS (LORD)
  2. The LORIS Trial: Addressing Overtreatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

francis-adeleSadly, just as I was getting acquainted with the work of Adele Francis (LORIS trial Principal Investigator), I learned of her sudden passing.

Although I did not know Adele personally, when I watched this video, I felt we we were kindred spirits.

So many lives have been blessed by Adele’s work and passion. May her spirit and wisdom continue to shine down upon all of us.

~ Donna Pinto, @DCIS411

“Travel Light. Live Light. Spread the Light. Be the Light.”

 

 

Posted in Health, Options, Personal Stories, Resources, Sanity, Support | Tagged , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Bye-Bye Mammograms: Hello SonoCiné Ultrasound

fail“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” – Albert Einstein

As more and more studies reveal the sad truth about mammograms, many women are left wondering what to do.

We all want better, safer and more conclusive ways to find tiny invasive breast cancers while also avoiding cumulative radiation harms, false scares, overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Just today, a Danish study debunking mammograms was all over the news. I heard physicians and reporters alike say — we need better technology! One reporter even said, “Mammograms are barbaric.”

I couldn’t agree more. And I’m thrilled to have recently discovered that better technology already exists. It’s called SonoCiné Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound (AWBUS) and it was invented by Dr. Kevin Kelly, a radiologist of 34 years who was passionate about improving ultrasound technology in an effort to find the tiniest cancers often missed by mammography (especially in dense breast tissue).

Not only does it find the earliest of invasive cancers in extremely dense breast tissue, there is no squishing, no pain, no radiation, no IV, and no contrast dye.

While SonoCiné is officially marketed as a supplement to mammograms and not as a replacement, I believe there is enough evidence to say bye-bye to mammograms forever! In case you are into the science, check out my recent article,  The Downside Of Mammograms: What Your Doctor May Not Be Telling You. It lists the studies as well as experts speaking out against mammography.

Here’s what women can do NOW to be the change needed for better, safer, more conclusive breast imaging…

tedxmb-kevin-kelly-300x300

Please share this information with all women you care about!

 

 

 

 

Posted in Health, Options, Personal Stories, Resources, Sanity, Support | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

DCIS Decision-Making — What Makes Us Different?

choicesWhy is it that a majority of women diagnosed with DCIS choose the path of “standard” aggressive treatment (mastectomy or lumpectomy plus weeks of radiation and years of “prevention” drugs), while a small minority say “NO WAY — this is OVER-TREATMENT?”

  1. Is it fear of invasive breast cancer and potential early death?
  2. Is it a calculation, a score from a test, a marker or a decision aid?
  3. Is it a belief or disbelief in the medical system and the cancer-care industry?
  4. Is it a feeling of no other choice?
  5. Is it pressure or bias from a medical professional?
  6. Is it a gut feeling?
  7. Is it an empowered feeling based on scientific evidence?
  8. Is it a desire to be over and done with it and get on with one’s life?
  9. Is it some or all of the above?
  10. Is it something else?

What is it for you?

Please leave a reply below if you feel like sharing how you came to your treatment decisions. Thank you!

 

Posted in Options, Personal Stories, Sanity | Tagged , , , , , , | 24 Comments

Donna’s Official “Better-than-Awareness” Checklist

screenshot-23

“Breast cancer is a dominant fear for many women. Fortunately, it’s also largely a preventable disease with the right diet and a healthy lifestyle. Contrary to what most people hope for, early detection by mammography causes more harm than good. Radical surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are brutal remedies universally prescribed to women with breast cancer, yet they provide little survival benefit. Hormone manipulation is of some value, however the best and most overlooked approach for treating breast cancer is a change in diet and exercise.” – Dr. John Mcdougall. Read more here.

 

Posted in Health, Options, Resources, Sanity, Support | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Downside of Mammograms – What Your Doctor May Not Be Telling You

peter-goetzchePeter Gotzsche, M.D., author of Mammography Screening: Truth, Lies and Controversy, states, “Screening saves probably one life for every 2,000 women who go for a mammogram. But it harms 10 others. Cancerous cells that will go away or never progress to disease in the woman’s lifetime are excised with surgery and sometimes (six times in 10) she will lose a breast. Treatments with radiotherapy and drugs, as well as the surgery itself, all have a heavy mental and physical cost. I believe the time has come to realize that breast cancer screening programs can no longer be justified.”  

Mammograms are the number one source of malpractice lawsuits against radiologists and this creates an incentive to over-diagnose breast cancer.    Dr. Fred Vernacchia, a radiologist and medical director at the San Luis Diagnostic Center in San Luis Obispo, The trouble with mammograms, LA Times

More Breast Cancer Experts are Now Speaking Out AGAINST Mammography

Michael Baum, an eminent professor of surgery at the University College, London, was involved in setting up the breast cancer screening program in the UK 20 years ago. Now he is an outspoken critic against mammography. He states, “I have watched with increasing alarm as evidence has accumulated that suggests the initial estimates of benefit were exaggerated and the initial estimate of harm was, frankly, ignored. What has gone wrong is that we would never have predicted how many of these cancers detected at screening lack the potential to threaten the woman’s life.”

Eric Topol, Medscape Editor-in-Chief and practicing cardiologist at Scripps in California, recently wrote an article titled, “Time to End Routine Mammography.” He says, All of the data now available point to significant net harm—far more risk than benefit— for routine mammography. If this were a drug, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would never approve it. Last year, the Swiss Medical Board, after reviewing all of the data, recommended abolishing mammography.” Time to End Routine Mammography, Medscape

“For too long, we’ve taken a brain-dead approach that says the best test is the one that finds the most cancers – but that’s wrong.”  – Dr. H. Gilbert Welch of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy, The trouble with mammograms, LA Times

“The goal of routine breast cancer screening is to prevent women from dying of breast cancer. Yet studies have shown that the popular claim ‘early detection saves lives’ is not actually true.” Breast Cancer Action, Should I Get A Mammogram? Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Routine Breast Cancer Screening

The Studies, the Facts, the Numbers, the Truth:

An unbiased review of SEVEN trials involving 600,000 women ages 39 to 74 concluded:

  • Screening did not reduce breast cancer 
  • For every 2000 women screened throughout 10 years, one will have her life prolonged and 10 healthy women, who would not have been diagnosed if there had not been screening, will be treated unnecessarily.
  • More than 200 (out of 2000) women will experience important psychological distress for many months because of false positive findings.”
  • A large 25-year study of 90,000 Canadian women aged 40 to 59 found no benefit for women who were randomly assigned to have mammograms:
  • The death rate from breast cancer was the same in both groups.
  • 22 percent of women in the mammography group were over-diagnosed resulting in 1 in 424 women receiving unnecessary cancer treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy and radiation.”

Another Very Serious Problem with Mammograms – False Negatives

A“false negative” is when a mammogram appears normal and cancer is actually present. According to Are You Dense?,  1 in 5 women (20 percent) will feel reassured they do not have breast cancer, when in fact they do. Breast density is one of the strongest predictors of the failure of mammographic screening to detect cancer. Two thirds of pre-menopausal and 1/4 of post-menopausal women have dense breast tissue. Please see Happy Gram the movie and ask for your past mammogram reports to see if you have dense breasts.

Even Worse, Could Mammograms Actually Induce and Promote Cancer? 

Dr. Samuel Epstein, chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition, and author of 270 scientific articles and 15 books on the causes and prevention of cancer states: “Radiation from routine mammography poses significant cumulative risks of initiating and promoting breast cancer. Contrary to conventional assurances that radiation exposure from mammography is trivial – and similar to that from a chest X-ray or spending one week in Denver, the routine practice of taking four films for each breast results in some 1,000-fold greater exposure. Premenopausal women undergoing annual screening over a ten-year period have an increased breast cancer risk by 1 percent per year resulting in a cumulative 10 percent increased risk over ten years.” – Dangers and Unreliability of Mammography, Cancer Prevention Coalition

What other screening options are there?

DCIS Redefined summarizes studies and provides information about thermography, ultrasound and MRI in comparison to mammography for screening or monitoring breast health. See Imaging and Monitoring. More on Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound coming soon! Read about Dr. Kevin Kelley, inventor of the SonoCine Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound here.

Is there anything else I can do to lower my risk of breast cancer?

Yes! Please check out The Proactive Breast Health Club to learn natural ways to reduce risk of breast cancer. It’s free to sign up to receive periodic articles.

More info and links to articles on Mammography here.

Posted in Health, Options, Resources, Sanity, Support | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Donna’s Story Featured in Women’s Health Magazine

womens-health

Click here to read: ‘Why I Refused to Get Treatment When I Was Diagnosed with Breast Cancer’

“Everyone has the association that cancer is a death sentence.”

“You’re backed into a corner because of unknowns. My doctor said, ‘Don’t be stupid. Just do radiation at least.’ They called me stupid. But why would anybody have surgery if there’s nothing to be seen? I know why that’s happening, that rush to get it out. It’s just that knee-jerk reaction when we hear the word cancer.”

Read the full story here.

Posted in Health | Leave a comment