DCIS is NOT a “Ticking Time Bomb” — What Women Really Need to Know

time bombCelebrity chef Sandra Lee was told by her doctors she was “a ticking time bomb.”

Is it any wonder that she and thousands of women like her are racing to the operating room to amputate both their breasts?

Why such radical treatment for DCIS?

“Right now, we have women getting bilateral mastectomies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which is not a cancer,” Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said. “It’s the world turned upside down.”

“There’s a hysteria around breast cancer. The extremism that sometimes comes into play in DCIS treatment decision making is a ‘cultural problem.’ This is not a life-threatening problem.” – Dr. Anne Partridge, MD, MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Experts are working to remove the word “CARCINOMA.”

“Use of the term ‘cancer’ should be reserved for describing lesions with a reasonable likelihood of lethal progression if left untreated.” DCIS is not such a lesion, according to a report issued by a National Cancer Institute working group.  A less threatening term they suggest is “indolent lesion of an epithelial origin.”

“DCIS is not invasive cancer so why are we treating it as if it is?”– Dr. Laura Esserman, Director of the Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center, UCSF

Debunking the theory that DCIS is early cancer destined to progress.

Even though more than 60,000 new DCIS cases are being treated each year (in the US alone), there has been no corresponding decrease in the rate of invasive breast cancer. This suggests that there has been little or no value in treating DCIS as if it were early cancer, according to Laura Esserman, co-author of an essay published in the Journal of the American Medical Association which made a forceful case for the name change and for a less aggressive approach toward treating DCIS.

Early detection does NOT save lives.  

Studies have proven the fundamental philosophy behind “early detection” is flawed. Not only do mammograms harm thousands of lives every year, they miss 20-25% of the really serious invasive cancers. Joan Lunden’s aggressive cancer was missed by a mammogram. It was found on an ultrasound.

Mammograms cause OVER-diagnosis and OVER-treatment of DCIS.

A study in Norway estimates that 15 – 25 % of breast cancers found by mammograms wouldn’t have caused any problems during a woman’s lifetime, but these tumors were being treated anyway, often by being surgically removed and sometimes treated with radiation or chemotherapy, (because there’s no certain way to figure out which ones may be dangerous and which are harmless).

Yet still, Sandra Lee stated in People Magazine, “My doctor called me a poster girl for mammography.” Now she is urging women as young as in their 20’s and 30’s to get their mammograms.

What Sandra Lee doesn’t realize… 

Her life was not saved by a mammogram. Her life was harmed by it.

Young women especially need to be cautious.

Young women tend to have dense breast tissue. Mammograms are harmful — not beneficial. Routine mammograms in young women also increase the risk for future breast cancer due to direct radiation exposure to breast tissue. For young women who have a high risk of breast cancer because of genetic mutations, the radiation from yearly mammograms may make the risk even higher. Read more here.

Radical treatments, fear, anxiety and financial hardship — all for what?

“We are curing people who don’t need to be cured,” Dr. Otis W. Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, told WebMD.

Women like Sandra Lee are “battling” something that doesn’t need to be battled.  She is a poster girl for “over-diagnoses” and “over-treatment” — treated for breast cancer unnecessarily — as explained in a NY Times article Cancer Survivor or Victim of Overdiagnosis.

Mammograms open a can of worms that is better left unopened.

Too many women like Sandra Lee are facing harsh choices — to chop off their breasts — or to live in fear of a “ticking time bomb.”  Once diagnosed with DCIS, women are paralyzed with this fear — and the choices given to them are inappropriately aggressive, harmful and costly. The alternative to mastectomy — a lumpectomy plus several weeks of daily radiation — also comes with harms, future worries, on-going surveillance and a high rate of failure.

DCIS surgery (lumpectomies) often FAIL — leading to multiple surgeries and mastectomies.  

Studies have shown 48% to 59% of women with DCIS surgery require a 2nd or 3rd surgery due to “positive margins.”  It is a problem inherent in the current DCIS treatment methodology — and ineffective lumpectomies are leading more and more women with DCIS (even low grade) to lose their breasts. “Although DCIS can be initially diagnosed with microcalcifications on a mammogram, the calcifications do not outline the whole area of involvement. There is no imaging tool that can tell the surgeon how much DCIS is present before the surgery, and a surgeon cannot see it or feel for it during the surgery.”  – Dr. Susan Love

More harms that women are left in the dark about. 

Prior to an open biopsy or lumpectomy, a procedure called wire localization is required in order to “guide” a surgeon in what in essence is a “blind surgery.” A wire is pierced through a women’s breast then the breast is smashed and radiated in a mammogram machine.  This procedure is painful, ineffective, harmful and barbaric. One does not need to have a medical degree to realize this is damaging to sensitive breast tissue. And the real frustrating part is it is a total failure 48 – 59% of the time (as stated above)!

Harms of radiation and tamoxifen are downplayed while benefits are exaggerated.

Imagine being told that after you have these invasive procedures and surgeries (which often fail), you will need 5-7 weeks of daily radiation therapy plus five years of a highly toxic drug called tamoxifen — both of which Dr. Michael Lagios, internationally recognized breast pathologist says are of little benefit. “It is understandable that patients would be confused by the information and misinformation, but the fact remains that radiation therapy for DCIS has a limited role, and that tamoxifen has no certain role at all.”

Radiation therapy and tamoxifen are carcinogenic, meaning they can cause cancer. In addition, they both have harmful side-effects, create severe psychological trauma, financial hardship and can increase mortality! Yet, these are one-size-fits-all “standard of care” treatments  for DCIS.

The treatment of DCIS is appalling. 

“The time is now to discuss a change in the approach to DCIS. We should be demanding change.” – Dr. Laura Esserman

No doctor should tell a woman that she is a “ticking time bomb.” 

If at any time you (or someone you know) feels pressured, rushed, bullied, or coerced to have aggressive treatment for DCIS, please reach out for support (see Facebook groups below).

Women deserve better.

As Dr. Esserman stated, women need to demand change. The only way to do this is by being fully informed. Here are 10 very important things women really need to know to avoid excessive, costly, invasive physical treatments and traumatic emotional harm:

1. Mammograms contribute to the radical over-treatment of DCIS. See the promise film: The truth about the routine breast screening program. Read Bye-Bye Mammograms — Hello SonoCine. Evaluate alternative screening and surveillance choices here.

2. DCIS is NOT invasive cancer. Read more on this topic here.

3. “DCIS is not an emergency. It’s something that creates an environment where cancer may arise over the next 10-20 years, yet patients are being told they need surgery in the next fortnight.” -Dr. Laura Esserman, Director of the UCSF Breast Care Center

4. Women can save their breasts! If you are told your only option is a mastectomy, Dr. Melvin Silverstein and other surgeons offer oncoplastic techniques with lumpectomies. Another option is “nipple sparing mastectomy.”

5. A 2nd pathology opinion from an expert pathologist such as Dr. Michael Lagios is a MUST! It can change the course of treatment and bring peace of mind with challenging decisions.

6. DCIS is heterogeneous in nature. Treatment should not be “one-size-fits-all” — it must be individualized. The The Van Nuys Prognostic Index offers a more tailored prognosis. It is based on size & grade of DCIS, margins and age of patient. Oncotype DX is the first clinically validated commercial genomic assay which reveals the underlying biology that can help guide DCIS treatment decisions by predicting the risk of any local recurrence of DCIS and the risk of invasive cancer.

7.  Active surveillance is a reasonable option for low grade DCIS. 

8.  In addition to SonoCine Automated Whole Breast UltrasoundDedicated breast MRI is a highly accurate and useful surveillance tool, especially for DCIS.  It’s 1% false negative rate means there is only a 1% chance that it will miss invasive cancer compared to whole body MRI with a 15% false negative rate.

9. Life-style strategies can increase breast health and reduce breast cancer risk or recurrence. Join the Proactive Breast Health Club and receive periodic articles.

10. Support is vital.  Just a few years ago, DCIS support groups were nonexistent (especially for women questioning the “standard of care.”) Today, thanks to the internet and Facebook, hundreds of women world-wide are connecting and sharing experiences, emotions and insights. Topics include both conventional and “alternative” treatments, surveillance, healing foods, supplements, stress reduction and healthy life-style habits. Please click the links and “join” the Facebook groups below:

About dp4peace

I was born and raised in New Jersey and moved to the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles when I was 12. I graduated with a BA in Journalism/Advertising from San Diego State University. After a short stint in magazine ad sales in LA, I was offered my dream job working for Club Med. I spent two years working at resorts in Mexico, The Bahamas, The Dominican Republic and Colorado. My husband Glenn & I met while working at Club Med in Ixtapa, Mexico. We returned to "real life/jobs" for three years before we embarked on a two year honeymoon around the world. Together we wrote a book called "When The Travel Bug Bites: Creative Ways to Earn, Save and Stay Abroad." I am also the author of "Cheatnotes on Life: Lessons From The Classroom of Life," a quote book for new graduates. Glenn & I live in San Diego with our two boys: Skyler, the yogi and Cody, the buddha! I enjoy running, yoga and working on projects that bring more peace, health and light to our world.
This entry was posted in Health, Options, Personal Stories, Resources, Sanity, Support and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to DCIS is NOT a “Ticking Time Bomb” — What Women Really Need to Know

  1. Janet says:

    Thank you for all of this wonderful information I too had been told I was a ticking time bomb with low to intermediate DCIS. The first time was back in 1999 I had two surgeries and radiation for 6 weeks with follow up mammograms for 13 years. I was diagnosed again in the same breast different area with the same type of DCIS given the same urgency and ended up with a mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. The real tragedy is that the mastectomy showed no residual DCIS. So all of this suffering for microscopic cells. Have enjoyed the information on DCIS redefined and have decided to change my whole outlook on future screenings. I will not have anymore mammograms and have been altering my diet getting a good night sleep exercising more and maintaining a healthy weight. This will do 10 times more for me than a mammogram ever would .


    • Wow Janet, your story is a real tragedy. Thank you for sharing it and for adding to this important conversation. Change will happen thanks to women like you and me and all who know that we all deserve better, safer, saner healthier ways of living without the fear of cancer. Many blessings to you on your renewed dedication to true health! 🙂 Donna


  2. informedconsent2014 says:

    This is a great, concise post and I’m sure very welcomed by not only women who are aware of your wonderful site but also to newcomers. I have been so angered and horrified by the Sandra Lee “ticking time bomb” nonsense. Also, the way her doctors described her as a “poster girl” for screening. As is so aptly stated, she is a poster girl for overdiagnosis and overtreatment! If nothing else, Ms. Lee should have made the point, in no uncertain terms, that her case is her case and that other women have many options based on their medical case and situation. The fact that neither she nor her doctors chose to put out responsible and logical remarks in the media is further proof that women are still being inundated with fear and panic tactics. This must stop and we are in the forefront of seeing to it that it WILL stop.

    I’ll be going in for yet another six month mammogram follow-up in June for a small grouping of microcalcs that were found in 2011 which I have refused to have biopsied. The pressure is being raised on me to have the biopsy which is the first step in the overtreatment insanity. I will keep you updated on what happens in June. I hope to impress on my doctor that this is MY body, MY choice, and I am not a ticking time bomb!


    • dp4peace says:

      Thanks for your comments — wonderfully stated my friend “informedconsent2014!” It is so irresponsible and so illogical, but actually shows the reality of what is really going on. So, in a way I am grateful. It is the epitome of all that is WRONG! And it has refueled me to speak out! I basically stopped my life this last week to address this issue! Good luck with your next Dr. visit/mammogram. I too refused to biopsy an area of calcifications that were labeled 3 years ago as “indefinite.” I have been monitoring with dedicated breast MRI annually and all has been clear. Best to live life as healthy as we can and take things as they come. No need to think the worst and “what if….” Take care and please keep us all posted! 🙂 Donna


  3. Gaylyn Bicking says:

    I did the whole thing. I had a lumpectomy and radiation. Now I may have thyroid cancer. Apparently thyroid cancer is more common in women who have had radiation. At least thyroid cancer is highly treatable. Still it could be avoided.


    • Dan says:

      I work for the truth about cancer. Please contact me if you would like to summit some of your content to us. We had over a million people to our website during our launch and have a passionate audience of about 65 percent women.We are exposing the corruption in the cancer industry. the truth needs to get out! if you want to be a part of it please let me know. Dan@thetruthaboutcancer.com


  4. gpinto64 says:

    Great article! Love the conciseness and the wonderful references to the true experts in the field that most people don’t know of but need to hear from. I am sure this article will give 1000’s of woman alternative options to the many difficult decisions they will face.


  5. gpinto64 says:

    Great article! Love the conciseness and the wonderful references to the true experts in the field that most people don’t know of but need to hear from. I am sure this article will give 1000’s of woman alternative options to the many difficult decisions they will face.


  6. DCIS can be designated as cancer or non cancer; there is no sense of this debate. DCIS is an early sign of defective estrogen signaling and the associated disturbance of genome stability. Its appearance is a message that the patient is endangered not only by the development of invasive cancer, but also by any other serious human diseases, such as diabetes, stroke, thromboembolism, cancers at several sites etc. Currently used aggressive therapies (mastectomy, radiation, chemotherapy and antiestrogen) are equally harmful against DCIS and advanced breast cancer. However, waiting and strict mammographic observation of DCIS is senseless. The causal therapy of DCIS is the improvement of hormonal and metabolic equilibrium of patients, estrogen signaling in particular. Moreover, improvement of insulin sensitivity, thyroid hormone synthesis, and vitamin D supplementation are very important. Natural compounds, such as ganoderma lucidum may upregulate the mediators of DNA stabilization and via this pathway strengthen the estrogen signaling as well. Either DCIS or breast cancer is curable with natural therapy!
    Suba Z. Causal therapy of breast cancer irrelevant of age, tumor stage and ER-status. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574892811666160415160211


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s