Articles Regarding DCIS “Controversies”
Articles on DCIS & Breast Screening Controversies
Articles discussing DCIS controversies increasingly question whether many women with low-risk stage 0 breast cancer are being overdiagnosed and overtreated. Researchers and physicians debate whether DCIS should continue to be labeled “cancer,” since many cases may never progress to invasive disease, yet often lead to surgery, radiation, and hormone therapy. Studies surrounding active surveillance, including the COMET trial, suggest that carefully selected women may be safely monitored instead of rushed into aggressive treatment. One of the major controversies included here is the lack of informed consent with mammography screening. “Life-saving” benefits are often exaggerated while potential harms, including overdiagnosis of indolent lesions such as DCIS, are downplayed or ignored.
The articles below offer balance so women can make informed choices for screening BEFORE and AFTER a DCIS diagnosis.
Renaming DCIS & Active Surveillance
Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis & Overtreatment
General Critique of Mammography / Screening Articles
Do Mammograms Save Lives?
-
- Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: Harm/Benefit Analysis – NBCC
- The National Breast Cancer Coalition (NBCC) Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2025
-
Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening Tests, A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials, Cancer Rose, 2023
-
Making sense of new studies questioning mammograms: Is the test worth having?, Washington Post, 2014
-
I’m just saying no to mammography: Why the numbers are in my favor, Washington Post, 2013
- Misfearing Breast Cancer, More evidence that routine mammograms make healthy people sick., SLATE, 2014
Informed Consent, Ethics & Communication